Continuous provision & ICT

16 10 2009

As an enthusiast of promoting ICT in the classroom, I hope that I include opportunities for children to experience a range of software and hardware that allows them to be creative, not so much as to overload them, but to give them freedom to develop a range of skills to aid them with their learning. Now, this has never been a problem when teaching 9-11 yr olds, but now I find myself in year 1, with a different skill set and am having to teach the basics all over again… What am I to do?

Starting points.

After thinking about the difficulties of marrying the ‘choice’ element of Continuous Provision (CP) with the need to teach them specific skills in ICT I came to the conclusion that I would have teach them to be independent, ironically a really specific and closed task (see future proof post below for more on that). Then I stumbled upon a website that has no writing, not instructions, but a lot of games. This site www.poissonrouge.com expects children to figure out what they should do in each particular activity, promoting choice and concentration. Brilliant for my 5 yr olds to wet their toes with.

We’ve also tried to record as much as possible using ICT in a natural way – as often as not, the video camera is out, or we take photos to help them remember what we’ve done.

Are there any other people in similar situations out there who can offer advice on how I can help my class to become IT literate and creative? Or I am going to have to resign myself to a different role, one of facilitating their future creativity further on in their school journey?




Ignorance is only good when you realise how limited your knowledge actually is

2 10 2009

In the midst of a teachmeet northwest meeting at the 21 Century Classroom in Salford. THe room is full of innovators and creatively enthusiastic people who have given me a view of teaching that I didn’t realise was there.

It seems to me that all this knowledge being shared is fantastic, and needs more awareness among the senior management in schools themselves. Some sort of recognition for these people, and how they are enriching the lives of the children they teach.

I’m glad I have been able to broaden my horizons today. Hopefully you’ll find a teachmeet near you soon.




Teaching & Learning – harnessing the talents of your class

22 09 2009

At our place we have a group of Year 6 children (10-11yrs) who meet once a week to discuss strategies for creating more effective learning. They meet with me and our head teacher, Mike Shepherd (Twitter: Smichael920), and we brainstorm ways of taking our curriculum into the 21st century to include pedagogy and technology – not always in that order. Recently, some of the more powerful discussion topics have been based on the work of both Chris Quigley and Guy Claxton and the 5 Rs in a classroom. http://kaizen4schools.wordpress.com

The children evaluated the needs of learners and video conference with other schools in our Kaizen Network (as mentioned in my previous post), the results of these discussions led them to create a learning mat for Year 3 children, focusing them towards being reflective learners, with key questions and space for evaluations. The children revisited the class three or four times and after each visit, amended their work to address the difficulties they faced. At one point they were so convinced that the mat should work that they taught a lesson themselves – complete with plan!

The dialogue between action (of school body) and reaction (of children) is not normally a two way street. It is most often a case of ‘We know what’s good for you, so just do it.’ This simple group has turned that in a different direction. This allows us to say to our pupils. This is the type of learning we want to happen (self-reflection). How could we do this? What would work for you? What ideas do you have? How can we make it work? Now, don’t get me wrong, it’s not fool-proof, you still need a clear vision of the direction you want the school to take, but the beauty of this type of work is that it creates child driven developments that impact directly on classroom practice: 5 schools have now taken the learning mats our children created, and made their own versions of them. Now you tell me that those children haven’t done more to create reflective learners in one term than some schools do in a year. That is learning at its most purposeful.




Future Proof

22 09 2009

Educo (v)– to draw out, to lead, to raise up, to praise, to rear

Online Dictionary (University of Notre Dame)

 

While writing this, the main thought buzzing around my head was: it is my job to create tomorrow’s teacher? If this was so, the focus then became what impact we have on the creation of the next generation of teachers.

Tomorrow’s Teacher will be the same as the teacher of today. It will require the same empathic nature that makes us able to communicate with others. It will require determination to push those who need pushing; the composure to restrict those who must be restricted; the compassion to comfort those who hope for comfort; the passion to inspire those who dream of greater things; the skills to influence those without direction; the knowledge to develop those who must be developed. In short, these things will always need doing; it is the nature of the job. What we must ask ourselves is what setting will these actions take place in? How will these skills and attributes be developed in order to fit into the wider world view? How can these be taught in an effective and modern way?

I’d like to say that I’d be tomorrow’s teacher. I think in some ways, that title is a misnomer. It is impossible to be Tomorrow’s Teacher today, unless you have a Delorian and Dr Emmett Brown. The most important consideration for Tomorrow’s Teacher, is that he must be allowed to teach in Tomorrow’s Workplace. Our education system is retrospective, harking back to regular factory jobs – a clocking in and out mentality. This is no longer the correct system in which to educate children. Schools were designed to prepare children for life in the outside world. Even now, as these children sit in lines, waiting for the bell to go, the need for this approach is dwindling. We must allow for this change and adapt our system in preparation for it. Otherwise we, as Today’s Teachers, are failing tomorrow’s.

Tomorrow’s Teacher will be resourceful; making use of whatever tools or time is available. He will be open to change and approach work creatively, varying the delivery and style of lesson. He will be realistic and honest with the children he cares for. He will be reflective in approaches and review his lessons proactively. He will be resilient, working through problems effectively and conscientiously.

As for the influx of technology and its integration into everyday life, those who ignore change, become obsolete. We need only look at the world around us to see that as true. Today’s Teacher needs to think about how he or she can improve and adapt in order to continue to be professional and relevant. I think about the lessons I do and how, I hope, they are tailored to the needs of the children. But part of me wonders if I, too, should be watching Hannah Montana or other programmes that my children watch? Should I go out and buy their music? The answer must surely be yes. Our career is based around a responsibility to prepare children for life in the real world. We need to know and understand their world and their needs, fears, hobbies. I’m not suggesting for one moment that Mrs Smith, a Reception teacher of nearly 40 years should suddenly go to Austria and learn to snowboard, but I am suggesting that she should have researched it and be equipped to talk about it if necessary.

Tomorrow’s Teacher needs to be flexible. With modern technology evolving at a tremendous pace, Tomorrow’s Teacher must embrace it and use it effectively. Yong Zhao, Head of the Confucius Institute at MSU, talked during a seminar about allowing today’s generation to access today’s technology. He stated, more eloquently than I do here, that they are simply ‘the best equipped to use it’. We guard it like a prized possession, afraid to use it in case something goes wrong; they break it in their efforts to push it to its limits. How many of Today’s Teachers think that by writing up their worksheet as a PowerPoint presentation, they are computer literate and embracing modern technology? I say they have not been given the opportunity to see the potential that these technologies bring.  They are simply rehashing the same worksheet, just making it tidier, more up to date.

The essence of innovation and growth is that it encourages change. No, it requires change. I feel that it is essential that teachers acknowledge the styles and approaches by which modern children live their lives – as this impacts directly on the way these children learn. You only need to look at the high proportion of children that learn better through ‘doing’. At least 50% of our children are now kinaesthetic learners, compared with a smaller percentage 7 years ago. Why? Technological advances for the Playstation Generation: The more interactive; the better.  I say that if teachers have not adapted to the needs of today’s children, then they are potentially failing Tomorrow’s Teachers.

The best way to improve the quality of teaching across the country is to be more rigorous during the application stage for trainee teachers. By this I don’t mean exclude those whose grades are not up to scratch, there is much more to teaching than just being able to write pedagogical essays, but rather be selective in the qualities of the individual selected for the course. There must be a higher academic bench mark for all of tomorrow’s teachers than there is today, but the basic assessment of their professionalism must lean more towards their competencies in the classroom, rather than the evocative rhetoric of their essays.

Teachers must be multi-faceted. I don’t remember every being taught this, but why should that be the case for teachers of tomorrow? Why can’t we teach children how to change their outlook, persona, style? When are we taught to be facilitators, co-workers, leaders? Not very often. We teach these life skills rarely in primary schools. Why? Because we are scared about getting it wrong. Surely teaching this would be more beneficial in the long run. We would then not have to rely on finding those people who inherently have the pre-requisite skills or those who are able to more effectively learn them; we could provide all children with opportunities to hone those skills and teach them how to learn more independently.   

Creating the teacher of tomorrow should have already started. The business theory of Kaizen – small incremental improvements, holds truer as a model for success than ever before. Efficacy and excellence are achieved through getting the little things right. It is through constantly re-assessing the relevance of what we do that makes us professional, not the framed qualification collecting dust in the loft. That is the real key to finding and keeping tomorrow’s teacher. It is by accepting that we still have something to learn, something to change. We still make mistakes and know how to correct them.

The organisation of today’s school system needs to change in order to allow this sort of teaching. By working with a more flexible approach to learning and individual learning needs, we can hope to raise standards in schools and also develop more adaptable and dynamic employees. I ensure that all children know how they learn best, and must decide for themselves what resources and help they require for each task, from a range of different sources. Some may choose a cue card, others to ask a partner, more still might attempt the task one way, stop and re-evaluate. The content of the task then becomes secondary to the skills developed when completing it. This, I believe, is the way we must approach teaching. The cries of: “Children still need to know facts!” falls on deaf ears. My reply is simple: No. They do not need to know facts. They need to know where to find facts.

The title, Tomorrow’s Teacher, again leads us to a quandary. Today’s Teacher will always be Yesterday’s Child. We constantly, as human beings, return to familiar settings and scenarios. We will, therefore, relate things in class to things we have done, use phrases or expressions that amuse us, link to, seemingly (at least from the children’s perspective), archaic programmes that would be relevant if only they were our age. We do this because it makes us feel safe or better about ourselves. So in order to prepare Tomorrow’s Teachers we, the children of yesterday, must teach them well today.




How do you teach creativity?

21 09 2009

The question I keep asking myself is this: why do you have to be so rigid in your delivery of creative lessons?

I looked to theatre for the answer. No, I don’t mean I put BBC 4 on, and pretended to understand the opera. I looked at the techniques that allow actors to ‘cultivate randomness’ specifically those by Sam Beckett. In order for something to look random, irregular, the actors were meticulously choreographed, down to the nearest centimetre. It seemed that the very nature of randomness didn’t look random enough, it looked clumsy.

That’s the word, clumsy. The last thing I want to deliver is a clumsy lesson, or not teach my children the necessary skills to become truely independent learners, fostering creativity and developing their own styles and teaching me in return and I found that if I allowed them to be limitlessly created, they panicked, refused to accept their freedom, like prisoners in the Panoptican; institutionalised. It’s amazing how much we narrow their expectations in order to make our lives easier. Go back to the root of the word educate: Educare – to learn, not to teach, control, contain. I know these are now pre-requisites – especially in the modern secondary school where a black belt in any martial art is almost as important as the Cert ed!

I had to wean them into creativity. I found it so contradictory that developing independence in my class, required their total dependence in my teaching! Ironic, don’t you think?